The party of tranny drag demons in classrooms thinks the system is “illegitimate”.

The Democrat Party and it’s leftist followers have decided that any system in which they don’t win every single debate on every single issue and get their way every single time is “illegitimate”. After investigating Trump for the last 7-8 years straight (they started investigating while he was campaigning) they’ve decided that now that the SCOTUS has decided that states can decided whether to kill their babies, they’re going to claim the system is illegitimate and simply not abide by the ruling.

The American People generally do not care about the January 6 hearings. The process of abortion and the most common reason for it occurring (studies and surveys show that it’s done for convenience over 90% of the time) are not palatable to the average American. almost no one is invested in ensuring that tranny drag demons read to their kids in elementary school classrooms. The vast majority of people would rather see our military defending our borders than focusing on climate change activism and pride month celebrations. They don’t want to see Navy sailor women running in formation behind the rainbow flag with no Navy or American flags in sight. They don’t want to be told that men can have periods. They don’t believe Joe Biden is capable of toileting himself without difficulty, let alone running the country anywhere but into the ground.

The democrat party is the party of these issues. That is their platform. I wish that was all of it but it gets worse when you hear that our economic situation is actually what they were aiming for. Problem is that we are still pretending economic “experts” are the ones who know what’s going on. Sorry to tell you this but millions of average Americans saw this inflation coming in 2020 when the fed started printing money out of thin air and dumping it into the system by the trillions. Boomers, Gen X and Millennials do understand that printing more money causes inflation. And most Americans know that there is enough oil under the US to sustain ourselves, and that we do not need to be suffering under these fuel prices. Bush, Obama and Trump all had us producing and refining more of our own oil than Biden.

If the Republican Party is not capable of winning the next two rounds of elections against the party of degeneracy, then they’re useless. Or possibly complicit.

Can we get a Desantis-Gabbard ticket for 2024 or 2028? Since Dana White and Joe Rogan don’t have any political ambitions.

Desantis promises Constitutional Carry in Florida.

Florida Governor Ron Desantis has promised that before he is finished as Florida governor, Florida will join the ranks of states that have “Constitutional Carry”. Constitutional Carry allows anyone who is legally allowed to own a firearm to carry that firearm openly or concealed in public. Some refer to it as “permitless carry”.

I’ve been watching this for years come up and be killed in the Florida legislature. All firearm related bills in Florida must pass through the Senate judiciary committee for a vote. Every year almost all pro-gun bills are shot down in committee despite having a 7-3 Republican majority in the committee. For several years, despite reshuffling committee seats after election seasons, the committee maintains at least a few anti-gun Republicans who vote with the Democrats on gun bills. This turns the committee to a 6-4 anti-gun committee. Senate President Wilton Simpson is an anti-gun Republican as well. He is not going bring the bills to the floor of the Senate without committee approval. When a pro-gun bill makes it a final floor vote, it will pass.

Despite being Republican controlled, the Florida Senate is weak when it comes to gun rights. The best they’ve done this past decade is simply hold the line, but they even fail at doing that sometimes. The speed at which they violated our rights after the Parkland school shooting was astonishing.

If Desantis wants Constitutional Carry in Florida, he’s probably going to have to pull some legislative tricks. The state of the Senate judiciary committee (and the Senate rules committee as well) is still unfavorable for pro-gun bills in Florida.

I don’t want Democrat (or Republican) politicians to visit the Southern border.

I keep seeing conservatives online complaining that Democrat politicians are visiting Ukraine, but are not spending any time at the US Southern border. Why is this? Why are conservatives so fixated on making sure Joe Biden and Nancy Pelosi and AOC travel to the Southern border? Are they going to get there and suddenly realize the error of their ways, become border hawks and start allocating funds for increased border security and wall building? More likely is that they’ll do what they’ve done every single time they go there. They’ll have some photo ops and lament that we white Americans are being so so mean to these innocent “migrants” and they’ll use the opportunity to ask for more money and more benefits for illegals, thereby drawing even more of them to our nonexistent border.

Here is a hint to conservatives: Stop whining that the Democrats (and Republicans) aren’t visiting the border. We don’t need politicians to get their photo ops on the border. We don’t need them meeting with the border patrol. We don’t need them to see the problems down there because they don’t see them as problems. They see opportunities to make money for themselves, collect votes, get cheap labor, enlarge the welfare state, advance socialism, ruin the country and replace white people. I don’t want them going there. Every time they do, they find ways to make it worse.

You know who we need on the border? The US military. And I don’t mean in some weak ass “support and assistance” role to the Border Patrol. I mean we need DMZ style border security. Don’t say we can’t do it. We have been doing it for decades in Korea. I spent a year going back and forth between the US Special Ops Command in Seoul, the 2ID Division HQ in Uijeongbu and the Joint Security Area at the DMZ. I know we can secure a border. The Navy, Marines and Coast Guard can easily handle our coastline, the Army and Air Force can handle the land border. We have drones, satellites, helicopters, sensors, and yes, fences, walls and concertina wire. We have one division that helps secure the DMZ. The Army has ten active duty divisions and numerous other standalone brigades. We also have Army Reserve and Army and Air National Guard units that need a place to conduct their yearly two week training exercises. We have an armor division in El Paso at Fort Bliss and a Cavalry division in Killeen at Fort Hood.

Spare me the detail nitpicking, the conservatives always come at me with minute reasons why using the military to secure the border isn’t doable. That’s freaking absurd. It’s literally the purpose that militaries exist in the first place. It’s supposed to be their primary job. If they only had ONE job, that’s what it would be. We can project the might of our military abroad so fast and in such overwhelming numbers to fight stupid, useless wars against people who are better armed than then people flooding our border, so I know we can reel some of that power in and place it where we need it the most.

Imagine a military that defends it’s actual border. Wouldn’t that be a sight to see?

PSA on Fascism vs the other “isms”.

Over the last few years there has been an huge uptick in the use of “fascist” being used to describe the right wing in America. Conservatives, Republicans, right wingers, whatever you want to call them, have been labeled as “fascists” in an effort to demonize them, and this leads quickly to being called an outright “Nazi”. The right wing responds in a predictable manner, resorting to the “no, you” defense. They accuse the left of being the “real fascists”.

This is disappointing for a couple of reasons. The first reason is that this tactic has been tried for years and hasn’t worked. The left has been accusing the right of being racist for decades, and the right just responds by accusing the left of being the “real racists”. In fact, by the true definition of the word, there are very few actual racists in America who are racist against minorities. That’s the only racism anyone with a platform is talking about. When you delve into anti-white racism, then you find that the left are in fact, proudly an publicly, anti-white racist. But that is not what the right wingers with a large platform are saying when they say that the left are the real racists. The right is accusing the left of being exactly what the left is accusing the right of being, which is racist against non-white people. So when the left accuses American conservatives of being “fascist”, conservatives simply accuse the left of being fascist. Guess what? The “no, you” tactic still doesn’t win the day. It’s an unintelligent, lazy, reactive argument, and it sucks.

The second reason this is a disappointing thing to see is because it’s flat out incorrect. The left is not fascist at all. Fascism is an inherently nationalistic ideology. Ultranationalist in fact, according to many scholars, including Henry Ashby Turner, the author of Reappraisals of Fascism. There is absolutely nothing whatsoever about the American left wing that is remotely nationalist in any way. They are Marxist, communist, socialist. Fascism is actually diametrically opposed to Marxism ideologically. The American left wing is certainly heavily authoritarian when it maintains a degree of control in government, and while fascism is an authoritarian system as well, so are many (almost all) other different forms of government. It can be said that all fascist systems are authoritarian, but not all authoritarian systems are fascist. It’s my opinion that finding a government with a hint of nationalist leanings in the Western world is quite possibly impossible.

Of note is the fact that historically speaking, fascism has been opposed to homosexuality and has been known to insist and impose upon society strict gender roles. “War for men and birthing for women”, in one written example. Certainly we can all agree that this is nothing remotely relatable to the modern left wing.

I’m not here trying to promote fascism. I don’t think there are actually any real fascists in the United States, or at least not of any significant number. What I am saying is that the American left wing is a strongly Marxist, communist and socialist movement, and they have been since at least the late 1940’s. They are in no way fascist or nationalist. It’s time to know our enemy and speak their name correctly.

“Dog whistles”

Saw a story about the Virginia governor’s election where the democrat lost to the Republican. Of course the mainstream media is on full time damage control. I noticed that one guy said McAuliffe lost because Youngkin was “dog whistling” to the right wing.

Dog whistling is the left wing term that basically accuses the right of saying racist things even when the right isn’t saying anything of a racist nature at all. Same applies to sexism or any other “ism” they want to accuse you of. Back in the day, in order to be accused of saying something racist or sexist, you needed to say something that they could somehow spin, no matter how farfetched and dishonest the spin, into something that might be roughly construed as racist or sexist to someone out there.

Now, you don’t have to do that at all. You only have to speak. Doesn’t matter what you say, you only have to speak and the deed is done. They’ll accuse you of using a racist or sexist “dog whistle”.

This is not entirely surprising, and I don’t think I’ve said anything to this point that my readers, how many or few there are, wouldn’t already know. But there is always something deeper to be examined. In this case, it’s the humiliation ritual the media is engaging in. That’s where the population is expected to accept something they know is so absurd, yet they can’t do anything to oppose it or stop it. At the minimum, they must accept that it is occurring and there is nothing they can do about that. It’s similar to the humiliation ritual the Soviet citizens endured in listening to their Communist propaganda day in and day out.

This is a symptom of a mainstream media that is fully controlled by the hard left and is totally ensconced in communist ideology and propaganda dissemination. They aren’t trying to be taken seriously because they know it’s not necessary to be taken seriously. They don’t have to say anything logical or truthful because their lies have gotten them where they are, in their ivory towers insulated from the dirt people they spew their absurdities onto.

What are we going to do about it? Some would say that what we will do is continue to win more elections. But I think Youngkin’s victory is going to prove something to everyone: That there is no voting our way out of what’s coming.

Don’t be surprised by what is happening in Australia.

If you’re surprised by what’s happening there, the draconian measures and outright violent tyranny, then you’ve been as blind as a bat.

Well, actually, bats see quite well. But that aside, what’s going on in Australia with their consistent Covid lockdowns enforced by police brutality should have been easy to see coming IF you have an understanding why the US founding fathers implemented our second amendment.

Any government that denies it’s citizens the right, or impedes it’s citizens ability, to own and bear firearms for their own defense has the affinity for the kinds of tyrannical behavior you see taking place in Australia. I’ll go so far as to say that any government that blocks the people from arming themselves is simply waiting for the opportunity to unleash their police and/or military to beat the populace into submission.

So since Australians have been denied the ability to arm themselves for quite some time, we all should have seen these events coming from miles away.

Now, all you moral conservatives… My question: If Australians had firearms in large numbers, and were capable of fighting back, such as in the event they had a second amendment… Should they be firing back? Should they fire live rounds back at the police? Should they be going armed to the doorstep of the politicians that enacted these lockdowns and have orders to police to beat down anyone who resists?

Before you answer, remember that a lot of morality today is actually just cowardice.

Plato’s regimes, and my addendum.

Plato, the Greek philosopher, has been thoroughly examined by the dissident wing (I’ve decided to refer to us, whoever we are, as the “dissident wing”) of the USA. His ideas have been discussed and written about plenty here at AP and to a lesser extent, I believe the input of his mentor, Socrates, and his notable student, Aristotle, have also been mentioned. I think it’s appropriate that Plato has received the closest attention. With that said, I’ve thought a lot about his ideas and written little about them. I don’t promise to give insight that is any deeper than anyone else here is able to. In fact, in the name of Socratic irony, I promise not to.

Plato’s “five regimes” discussed in his eighth book of Republic are a fairly simplistic representation of the progression of human attempts at governance, which is good. Too many people make attempts at complicating their own interpretation of the progression of government systems because complexity is seen as a sign of intelligence. However, the ability to explain a complicated model in simple terms is actually a sign of high understanding. Knowing that simplifying a subject is necessary is a sign of wisdom.

The five regimes are written out in a progression from the first, called aristocracy, to what Plato lists last, which is tyranny. These progress from most desirable to least. Aristocracy, timocracy, oligarchy, democracy, tyranny is the order from top to bottom, first to last, most desirable to least. My personal addition, if I may make one, is anarchy. My version of anarchy as it relates to Plato’s regimes doesn’t totally line up with the modern day definition of anarchy. Perhaps just partially. Essentially I feel it is an absence of any discernible, effective system of governance.

Plato’s first regime is that of aristocracy. In our time, we may view this word with a negative connotation, but Plato viewed this system as one ruled by philosopher king(s) with “souls made of gold”. Contrary to our definition, these rulers would be in charge, but aside from basic human needs, they would own very little and live modestly. In the days of Greek rules, they may not even be permitted to own land at all. An aristocratic system would contain a caste system. I don’t believe there is a system in the world today that resembles Plato’s aristocracy.

The timocracy follows when people of slightly lesser virtue (described as people with souls made of silver or bronze) make their way into the ruling class by way of miscalculation by those who managed the aristocracy. Plato’s described the timocracy as a mixture of good and bad qualities. Some of the people who rise to the ruling class are concerned not only with ruling virtuously, but also with procuring wealth for themselves. The government system will change it’s own rules in order to make it easier for the ruling class to cement their positions, consolidate power and build their own wealth.

The oligarchy follows the timocracy, and now you see where we are headed. Riches and wealth are now the most important goals of the rulers and the citizens. rather than electing people who are wise and virtuous, and who’s ambitions do not include power and money, the accumulation of money is the virtue that gets one elected. The ruling class has money, the lower classes want money, and there is little else to be considered. The military is prone to strategic and tactical failure due to the fact that those who are best fit to positions in the military are being pushed into the ruling class where they don’t belong, or to the lower class where their talents are wasted, and the vacancies in the military are filled by those who seek to use that position to advance their own interests.

Democracy is next, which is possibly where we see ourselves at this point in time. People are concerned with freedom and Liberty, but only with their own definition of what those words mean. Many don’t even attempt to define what it means. The majority of the citizens are preoccupied with pointless activities and unnecessary goals. Democracy is managed by a large number of individuals, both elected and unelected, who are driven by personal gain. Democracy causes people of poor intellect and poor morals to gain positions of power. The people are primarily obsessed with materialism, and the government system is geared to enhance this by promoting “equality”, which is just a word the rulers will use to promise more material wealth, usually at the expense of a subgroup of citizens that has resisted the ruling class. Despite the fact that we are all taught that democracy is the highest and most virtuous form of government to be sought, this is false. Democracy is mob rule. The mob is neither intelligent nor virtuous. My position is that at least 90% of the electorate is unfit to choose a ruler for a nation of any size. Plato states that democracy is not desirable.

The last phase of Plato’s regimes is the tyranny phase, which most of us dissidents have been predicting for several decades now. Somehow our “democracy” drags along. In tyranny, the people have become tired of the democratic processes. Chaos rules and people are allowed, even encouraged, to violate rules and laws. Eventually, a person or group is able to seize power and transition the system into a harsh tyranny. Very rarely is a tyrant overthrown completely. Usually the overthrow results in a brief moment of anarchy, followed by yet another version of tyranny, nearly identical to the one before, if only more capable in the skills of tyrants. I feel the US is in a transition period between democracy and tyranny. Neither form of government is desirable.

My addition to Plato’s continuum is a sixth phase, which is anarchy. I won’t posit that anarchy always occurs or that it occurs in a specific place in Plato’s order. I won’t even claim that Plato’s phases always occur in a specific order, though we can observe it happening frequently. In this article, I view anarchy as the absence of one of the five regimes, where there is no regime. It would be hard to predict when or if this will happen, but when it does, it will not be difficult to identify, if there is even anyone attempting to intellectually identify it at all. When there is not, that would be a sign.

Plato’s philosophies are not without fault, of course, and I’m sure those faults will be (and should be) discussed by dissidents. But I do subscribe to the idea of these regimes being an identifiable course of human governance, and I do subscribe to the placement of democracy as the penultimate undesirable regime, as I no longer can point to any positive long term results of allowing a selfish, immoral, materialistic mob to vote favors for themselves and punishments for those they view as dissenters.

Justification for the purges.

https://m.washingtontimes.com/news/2021/oct/24/biden-officials-find-racism-throughout-government-/

I’m sure they did find “racism” throughout the government. “Racism” is the only thing these people see. And I guarantee that it’ll be blamed on you and me, and people like us.

In the article, they mention that Biden’s admin would like to give more money to “minority owned” businesses. They want half of the federal contracts to specifically go to minority owned businesses, despite only 40% of people in the US being labeled as minorities, and even less businesses being labeled “minority owned”. This will seriously degrade the government’s capabilities. But I believe that is the goal.

Let democracy die.

I do not have the time right now to say what I want to say about the American government system we call “democracy”. I’ll just let this guy tell you what I think.

A few things I heard on the news.

Getting back into writing so while I ride in the car, I’m just typing my thoughts. I’ll get back to doing it better soon enough, you know, with actual links and stuff. Thanks for hanging in.

Recently saw that a man in Minneapolis had his charges dropped after he shot at police. The reason was self defense. Turns out he was armed with a rifle and standing guard outside of his business during all that Minneapolis riot bullshittery. The cops had bodycam video of themselves driving around in an unmarked van doing literal dive-by shootings using “non-lethal” ammo. They were filmed shooting people at close range and driving off. As it happens, they started shooting at this dude, and he returned fire using real ammo. Unfortunately, none of the badged assholes were hit. Once the guy knew he was shooting at cops, he threw his rifle away (big mistake) and dropped to the ground. The cops of course went into “STOP RESISTING” mode and beat the hell out of him. Every cop at the scene was caught on camera lying out of his ass. Of course none were punished because cops are above the law.

Kalifornia has banned small engines. What? How the hell is anyone supposed to mow grass? Are they even allowed to do that anymore? They don’t manage their state areas and that’s why they get raging wildfires every single year. So I guess now the yards can burn too.

China is the premier power in the world now. The only reason America matters to anyone is because the US dollar is still used for, well, everything. But China still gains benefit from even that. Also, the US military is still the global merc force for hire. Everywhere to be found except for our actual border. Always the debate rages on about which generation screwed America the worst. You can answer that question easily by asking this question: Which generation sold our business, industry and manufacturing to China? I can tell you this, it was not anyone under the age of 40.

Be on the lookout for the NovaVax vaccine. It’s a more traditional vaccine technology. Showing great results in Europe and Canada. Few side effects, basically like normal vaccines. Is doing well at preventing severe illness and hospitalizations. The US has it tied up with red tape for now, but they’re cutting through it. The wife and I will be getting it when it’s available. Spare me the bellyaching. The left hates me because we refuse their poisonous, experimental vaccines. The right hates me because I’m willing to get the traditional vaccine technology when it’s thoroughly tested (NovaVax). I know none of us will ever be pure enough for the mob.

Beef prices are through the roof and chicken is up too. pretty much all meat is up. But Biden’s “food czar” says that food prices are fine and not rising as long as you remove meat from the equation. That’s how you know none of those jerks pays for their own food, or at least they aren’t the ones shopping for it.